Section I Part B (short answer and extended answer questions)
Answers are given in the right hand column. The left hand column contains some advice about how to go about answering the question – how to work out what is required and what amount of information to provide and how to avoid common pitfalls and traps; it also gives a reference to the relevant pages in CCHSC.
Question 16 (5 marks) | |||||||||||
Factual
material you need to know. In describing the test be sure to use liquid compounds; remember that the simplest alkanes and alkenes (up to butane and butene) are gases at room temperature. This is a simple test so make sure you describe fully what you did and what you observed. The equation given here is a simplified one that seems to be acceptable to the HSC examiners. The more correct equations are given on p 10 (though using 3-hexene instead of 2-hexene) (p 9-10) |
(a) |
|
|||||||||
(b) | Alkenes decolorise
brown bromine water whereas alkanes do not. In our experiment drops of
brown bromine water were added to 1 mL samples of the liquid compounds to
be tested, hexane and 2-hexene, with the test tubes being gently shaken
between additions. The 2-hexene, an alkene, decolorised the bromine water
while the hexane, an alkane, did not. |
||||||||||
Question 17 (5 marks) | |||||||||||
You
need to analyse this question carefully before starting to write. The normal treatment for municipal water supplies in Australia is clarification by flocculation and filtration followed by sterilisation by chlorination. Sterilisation is definitely to make the water safer to drink, but is clarification really to make the water safer to drink or is it more to make the water more appealing to look at and possibly to improve its taste? For this question if it is clarification you want to talk about you need to give it a safety slant. The process of flocculation can remove small amounts of harmful heavy metals if they are present and to some extent it can reduce the concentrations of viruses and parasites. So what features of catchments are these processes of clarification and sterilisation protecting people from? Farming activities particularly those involving sheep, cattle, pigs and poultry can lead to harmful bacteria, viruses and parasites getting into the water as rain washes across animal droppings (faeces). Forestry activities can lead to land clearing so that runoff from the area picks up considerable quantities of suspended solids that cause the water in the dam to become turbid. Roads through the catchment can have similar effects. Mining activities can also result in increasing sediment loads and to heavy metals getting into the water; mining can also alter pH necessitating pH adjustment in the water treatment plant. You could use any of these as your two features provided you geared your treatment processes to them. Of course the primary method of making water safe to drink is to keep virtually all human activity out of the catchment area, but that is probably not part of the question.. (p 289-91, 262-77) |
The
features of the catchment determine what undesirable substances get washed
into the storage dam and so what treatment is needed to make the water
safe to drink. Two features are: (1) current (or previous) logging activities that have left parts of the catchment cleared of its original tree and scrub cover so that rain runoff washes considerable quantities of sediment into the dam, some of which stays in the water as suspended solids (very fine particles) and makes the water turbid. In such cases the water needs to be clarified by flocculation and filtration. In this process Fe3+ or Al3+ is added to the water, pH adjusted and the water gently stirred so that a precipitate of Fe(OH)3 or Al(OH)3 forms. As this precipitate coagulates into larger particles the fine suspended particles originally in the water adsorb onto it. The precipitate is removed with a coarse sand filter to produce very clear water. This process is intended primarily to improve the appearance of the water, to prevent annoying depositions in pipes and fittings and to remove any unpleasant taste the raw water had. However it can make the water safer to drink in that if the raw water had been contaminated with heavy metals this process would have precipitated much of them out as well, and it would also have removed (by adsorption) significant amounts of any viruses and parasites present. (2) pastoral activities within the catchment such as grazing cattle or sheep. This results in the runoff water picking up bacteria, viruses and parasites as it passes over animal faeces and flows into the dam. Such microorganisms are harmful to people and so to make the water safe to drink they are removed by sterilising the water, generally with chlorine (though use of the more effective but more expensive ozone is gaining in popularity). This sterilisation is generally the last step in water treatment.
|
Question 18 (5 marks) | ||
The
electron-dot structures in CCHSC are not strictly Lewis structures
and while they would probably be acceptable as the answer for this
question, it is safer to stick with the less clear though authentic Lewis
structures given in the sample answer at right. Incidentally the
structures in the Examiners Report with lines instead of pairs of dots or
crosses are not Lewis structures either! The difference in physical properties arises because O2 is non-polar whereas O3 is polar. This is not addressed in CCHSC and you may be puzzled as to why O3 is polar, because the shared electrons are shared between atoms of the same element and so should be evenly distributed which would make the molecule non-polar. The polarity arises from the nature of the O–O single bond: it forms by a pair of electrons that had been owned exclusively by one O atom becoming shared between two O atoms (see the diagram at the bottom of p. 242). The donating O atom has effectively lost one electron (and so has become positively charged) while the receiving O atom has effectively gained one electron and so has become negatively charged. This would make the molecule polar: and this structure can explain the physical properties. This is not the full story but it explains the polarity of the molecule and is adequate for HSC purposes. It is not so easy to explain the different stability and reactivity in terms of polarity. The answer opposite is probably the best that can be expected at the HSC level. If saying that the double bond in O2 is very stable and so less reactive than a single bond in O3 seems inconsistent with what you know about alkenes and alkanes, namely that the double bond in alkenes is much more reactive than the single bonds in alkanes, bear this in mind: the reactivity of the double bond in alkenes arises because it can be opened out to form two new single bonds leaving a C–C single bond intact (for example the equation in Question 16 above). In O2 for reaction to occur the double bond must be completely broken – it cannot open out to form new single bonds. (p 244) |
(a)
(b) |
While O2 and O3 are
both gases at room temperature, O3 has a much higher boiling
point than O2.This is partly because it has a higher molecular
weight (48 versus 32) but also because it is a polar molecule (central O
atom positively charged) whereas O2 is non-polar. O3 is more
soluble in water than O2, again because it is polar (polar O3
dissolves in polar water). |
Question 19 (5 marks) | ||
There
are 3 marks for drawing the graph, so make sure you use good techniques.
Make the independent variable (concentration) the x axis, choose scales
that use up most of the grid, mark the scales on the axes and label the
axes. Plot each point as a fine dot and identify the points with a circle,
square, triangle or cross (the sample graph in the Examiners' report is
deficient in this last respect: make sure yours aren't!) |
(a)
|
|
Read
off the concentration as accurately as possible: 1.65 ( ± 0.05).
Remember that this is a concentration in mg/L. You want the amount of Zn
in one tablet, so you need to convert the concentration to an amount in
100 mL because that is the volume that one tablet was made up to. (p. 228-30) |
(b) | From the graph
concentration of Zn in the solution made from the tablets =
1.65 mg/L = 0.165 mg/100 mL Since the tablet was dissolved and the solution made to 100 mL, the amount of Zn in one tablet is 0.165 mg . |
Question 20 (3 marks) | ||
Know that all gases have the
same molar volume. Look up its value in the Data Sheet at the end of the
paper. (p 128-9) |
(a) | One mole of any gas
at 100 kPa and 25oC has a volume of 24.79 L. Hence number
of moles in the sample = 15.0 /
24.79
= 0.605 mol This means that 1.22 g is 0.605 mol Molar mass of this gas = 1.22 / 0.605 = 2.02 g/mol |
If you do not know that hydrogen
has a molar mass of 2 g/mol (atomic weight of 1), use the Periodic Table at
the end of the paper to find what gas it could be. |
(b) | The gas is
hydrogen. |
Question 21 (4 marks) | ||
You need to know how CFCs got
into the atmosphere, that they were harmful there and that there were
international agreements to eliminate their use. Then you need to be able to
interpret the graph in terms of increasing use and then cessation of use of
CFCs. (p 250-8) |
(a) | CFC-11 was widely used for a variety of purposes (particularly in refrigeration) in the second half of the 20th century. Some of it escaped into the atmosphere, and because it was not destroyed there, its concentration steadily increased as the graph shows from 1980 to 1990. By the 1980s it was recognised that CFCs were destroying ozone in the stratosphere (they slowly diffused there from the lower atmosphere), and starting in 1987 there was a series of international agreements that first restricted then finally eliminated the use of CFCs. The slowing down in the rate of increase that appears in the graph between 1990 and 1993 and then the slow decrease in CFC-11 concentration after 1993 reflects this reduced use and release of CFCs. |
Here you need to explain why it
is important to reduce the concentration of CFCs in the atmosphere and how
monitoring their concentrations can show whether international programs to
reduce their release to the atmosphere are working. (p. 250-8) |
(b) | To check whether
international agreements to reduce CFC-11 (and other CFC) concentrations
in the atmosphere are working and that we are solving the ozone hole
problem. CFC-11 (and other CFCs) are not destroyed in the lower atmosphere
and so slowly diffuse into the stratosphere where they destroy ozone. We
need ozone in the stratosphere because it filters out short wavelength u.v.
radiation which is harmful to humans and other species. If the
concentration of CFCs in the lower atmosphere falls, then less CFC will
diffuse into the stratosphere and so there will be less destruction of
ozone. |
Question 22 (5 marks) | |
You
need to explain why using ethanol as a fuel appears carbon neutral and
to explain why this is not correct. And as asked by the examiners,
include relevant chemical equations. The relevant chemical equations are
the ones for photosynthesis, fermentation and combustion. All three are
required. Note that you are asked to critically evaluate the extract. This means you must comment on the extent to which it is correct and in what ways it is incorrect. (p 33-5) |
The extract is
partially but not completely true. At first sight ethanol looks like a
'carbon-neutral' fuel, meaning that its use as a fuel only releases into
the atmosphere the amount of carbon dioxide that was removed from the
atmosphere by its synthesis. This carbon neutrality arises as follows.
Ethanol is made by fermentation of carbohydrates which were made by
photosynthesis: Photosynthesis: 6CO2(g) + 6H2O(l) ® C6H12O6(aq) + 6O2(g) glucose Fermentation: C6H12O6(aq) ® 2C2H5OH(aq) + 2CO2(g) Overall result: 4CO2(g) + 6H2O(l) ® 2C2H5OH(aq)) + 6O2(g) When ethanol is used as a fuel it undergoes combustion: 2C2H5OH(aq) + 6O2(g) ® 4CO2(g) + 6H2O(l) This combustion reaction is the reverse of the overall synthesis reaction and so using ethanol appears carbon neutral. However this argument overlooks several energy inputs into this cycle. To bring about photosynthesis we need to grow crops; this requires the expenditure of much energy to cultivate and harvest the crops and to make the fertiliser needed to make them grow. This energy input is generally from fossil fuels and so there is considerable release of carbon dioxide involved. Then to ferment glucose or other sugars to ethanol there are further inputs of fossil fuel energy, first to heat the fermentation mixture, but more importantly to distill nearly pure ethanol (>95%) from the dilute aqueous solution that fermentation produces. The heat required is generally obtained from fossil fuels and so involves release of considerable amounts of carbon dioxide. Hence when all aspects are considered there are very significant releases of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere when ethanol is used as a fuel. Overall the extract presents a biased (and incorrect) picture of the true situation because it oversimplifies the energy inputs into the total process. |
Question 23 (4 marks) | ||
Write
the equilibrium reaction involved, state Le Chatelier's principle and
explain how it affects the choice of pressure and temperature. You need
to point out that Le Chatelier's principle is not the only consideration
in choosing temperature – reaction rate is also a consideration. Note that you are not asked to discuss the other factors that affect yield such as use of a catalyst and removal of product as it forms. (p. 200-3) |
The
Haber process for synthesising ammonia uses the equilibrium reaction, N2(g) + 3H2(g) 2NH3(g) (DH is negative) The yield of ammonia is optimised by using a high pressure (2.5 X 104 kPa) and a moderate temperature (700 K). Le Chatelier's principle states that when an equilibrium reaction is disturbed, it will move in the direction that minimises the disturbance. In this reaction 4 moles of gas ® 2 moles of gas, so if the pressure is increased, the equilibrium moves to the right as a decrease in the number of moles of gas will lower the pressure. Hence a high pressure will improve the yield of ammonia. This reaction is exothermic (releases heat as it goes from left to right), so lowering the temperature will cause it to move to the right in order to release some heat and so partly counteract the lowering of the temperature. However equilibrium considerations are not the only ones needed in selecting the temperature. The rate of this reaction (like most reactions) decreases as temperature is decreased, so working at a low temperature will produce a good yield but a long time will be needed to get there. On the other hand a high temperature will get to equilibrium quickly but the yield will be very low. Hence a compromise is used: a moderate temperature is used because this gives a moderate yield moderately quickly. |
|
Question 24 (5 marks) | ||
Calculate the
heat released per gram for each fuel and write it on the question paper
(petrol 48, kerosene 48, hydrogen 143, ethanol 30) then choose hydrogen.
No explanation is required. |
(a)
|
hydrogen |
You
need to convert volume to mass (using density) then mass to moles and
finally moles to quantity of heat. And show your working. How many
significant figures should you use? There are probably three in the heat
of combustion of petrol, two in the density, three in the molar mass and
one or two in 80 L. Hence only two are justified in the answer, but to
carry on into part (c) you should probably keep three. |
(b) |
Mass of petrol in
the fuel tank = 0.69 X 80 = 55.2 kg
= 55200 g Number of moles of petrol = 55200 / 114 = 484.2 mol Energy released = 484.2 X 5460 = 2.6 X 106 kJ (2.64 is acceptable) |
Again
show your working and again be careful with significant figures. There
are three in the heat of combustion of hydrogen but as explained above
only two in the energy released so the answer should contain only two. Do not follow the examples in the examiners' report which completely ignore significant figures (giving six digits in the final answers!) (p. 36-7 and CCPC p. 276-81) |
(c) | Number of moles
of hydrogen required to supply this amount of energy = 2.6 X 106 / 285 = 9.26 X 103 mol Volume of this at 100 kPa and 25oC = 9.26 X 103 X 24.79 L = 2.3 X 105 L |
Question 25 ( 5 marks) | ||
To
identify the anode and cathode you need to look up the electrode
potentials. Chlorine is higher than nickel (1.36 V versus –0.24 V).
Therefore the chlorine half reaction, Cl2(g) + 2e– ® 2Cl–(aq) goes as written. Hence reduction occurs at this electrode and that makes it the cathode. (p. 49) |
(a) | |
Combine
the chlorine half reaction (above) with the reverse of the nickel one, Ni(s) ® Ni2+(aq) + 2e– noting that electrons balance, so just add. |
(b) | Cl2(g)
+ Ni(s) ®
2Cl–(aq) + Ni2+(aq) |
Either Ecell = electrode potential of the chlorine electrode – electrode potential of the nickel electrode that is Ecell = 1.36 – (–0.24) = 1.60 V or Ecell = voltage of the chlorine reduction half reaction + voltage of the nickel oxidation half reaction (which is minus the voltage for the reduction half reaction), that is Ecell = 1.36 + 0.24 = 1.60 V Be careful in your use of symbols E or e. Do not confuse electrode potentials (always for reduction half reactions) with half cell potentials (oxidation or reduction). To get the cell voltage we subtract electrode potentials or we add half cell potentials but of course we get the same answer regardless of method. (p. 64-70) |
(c) | Ecell
= 1.36 + 0.24 = 1.60 V with the chlorine electrode (Pt wire) being positive. |
Actually
if reaction proceeded for a considerable time a slight green colour
would develop in the right hand beaker, because there is migration of
ions through the salt bridge as current flows: Ni2+ ions
migrate from the left hand beaker to the right hand one while chloride
ions migrate from right to left. but that is beyond the requirements of
this question. (p. 48-9) |
(d) | The colour becomes more intense (darker) in the left hand beaker, because solid nickel is oxidised there to Ni2+ which is green. This increases the concentration of Ni2+ in that solution which makes the colour more intense. There is no colour change in the right hand beaker, because the chloride ions generated there are colourless. |
Question 26 ( 4 marks) | ||||||||||||
You
need to be explain what a buffer is before you try to explain how it
works. An equation is necessary. The example used here is the obvious
choice. Another one that could have been used is the dihydrogen
phosphate–hydrogen phosphate one: H2PO4–(aq) + H2O(l) H3O+(aq) + HPO42–(aq) (p 166-8) |
A
buffer is a solution that maintains fairly constant pH even when acid or
base is added to it. It does this because it contains comparable amounts
of an acid and its conjugate base. A specific example in a natural
system is the carbonic acid–hydrogen carbonate buffer. The
equilibrium reaction involved is H2CO3(aq) + H2O(l) H3O+(aq) + HCO3–(aq) At equilibrium this buffer produces a pH of about 7. If H3O+ is added to this solution, the equilibrium moves to the left (Le Chatelier's principle) and so removes much of the added H3O+ and so returns the pH to close to its original value. If hydroxide ion (or some other base) is added to the solution and removes H3O+, the equilibrium moves to the right to produce H3O+ ions and so again returns the pH to near its original value. |
|||||||||||
Question 27 (4 marks) | ||||||||||||
You
need to know that the ammonium ion is a weak acid and that the ethanoate
ion is a weak base. And also that the sodium, chloride and nitrate ions
do not hydrolyse in aqueous solution. (p 152-4) |
(a) |
|
||||||||||
Use
the equation you are required to write to explain how the hydrogen ion
concentration of the solution is different from that of pure water. (p. 152-4) |
(b) |
Ammonium chloride. The ammonium ion is a weak acid which means that in
aqueous solution it ionises to produce hydrogen ions: NH4+(aq) + H2O(l) H3O+(aq) + NH3(aq) This means that the solution contains a greater concentration of hydrogen ions than pure water does and so it is acidic. You could have chosen ammonium nitrate;
the argument would be exactly the same. Had you chosen sodium ethanoate
the argument would have been: |
||||||||||
Question 28 (6 marks) | ||||||||||||
This
is a standard volumetric calculation; the two key equations are 5.14 and
5.15 on p. 160. Show your working so if you make a careless mistake the
examiner can give you some marks. Watch significant figures. There are 4 in 1.314 g and in 250.0 mL so formally there should be 4 in the answer, 0.04958 mol/L and 0.09301 mol/L. However the accuracy of a volumetric flask in usually no better than 0.1 or 0.2% which would justify only three significant figures in the answer. Three or four would be acceptable, but fewer or more could lead to a loss of a mark. Note that that HCl and Na2CO3 react in the ratio of 2:1 so take this into account in (c). (p. 159-62) |
(a) | Molar mass of
sodium carbonate, Na2CO3 = 2 X 23.0 +
12.0 + 3 X 16.0 = 106.0 g/mol Number of moles of Na2CO3 used = 1.314 / 106.0 = 0.01240 mol This is made into 250 mL solution (= 0.250 L) Molarity = 0.01240 / 0.250 = 0.0496 mol/L |
||||||||||
(b) | 2HCl(aq) + Na2CO3(aq) ® 2NaCl(aq) + H2O(l) + CO2(g) | |||||||||||
(c) | Volume of Na2CO3
solution needed = 23.45 mL = 0.02345 L Moles of Na2CO3 used = 0.02345 X 0.0496 = 0.001163 mol Moles of HCl this reacted with = 2 X 0.001163 = 0.002326 mol This was in 25.00 mL = 0.02500 L Concentration of HCl = 0.002326 / 0/02500 = 0.0930 mol/L |